Lissu Vs Kinana Ignite Political Firestorm: Clash Between CCM and Chadema Grips Tanzania, Sparking Mayhem
By Adonis Byemelwa
Tanzania's political landscape is heating up as leaders from the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) and the opposition party Chadema engage in a fiery debate over constitutional reforms and electoral laws.
Abdulrahman Kinana, the Deputy Chairman of CCM on the mainland, and Tundu Lissu, the Vice Chairman of Chadema, have exchanged sharp remarks, revealing deep divisions and contrasting visions for the country's future.
In a recent address to CCM supporters in Dodoma, Abdulrahman Kinana responded to Chadema's demands for a new constitution, electoral reforms, and the structure of the Zanzibar-Tanganyika Union.
Kinana accused Chadema of attempting to divide Tanzanians with their agenda, emphasizing that existing electoral laws are robust and that success in elections depends on more than just legal frameworks.
He pointed out Chadema's previous withdrawal from negotiations on constitutional matters and criticized their insistence on being the sole voice in discussions.
Kinana also challenged Chadema's assertions regarding the Zanzibar representation and the role of the President in electoral processes, debunking claims of favoritism towards Zanzibar and asserting that similar structures exist worldwide without controversy.
He accused Chadema of employing propaganda tactics reminiscent of Joseph Goebbels to manipulate public opinion.
Responding to Kinana's remarks, Tundu Lissu of Chadema reiterated his party's long-standing calls for constitutional reforms. He criticized CCM's track record of delaying constitutional changes since the reintroduction of multi-party politics in 1992, highlighting successive postponements and broken promises.
Lissu also lamented the rejection of Chadema's proposals for an independent electoral commission and emphasized discrepancies between electoral laws and the constitution.
Lissu dismissed Kinana's accusations of Chadema's divisive agenda, insisting that their demands for reforms are rooted in genuine concerns for democracy and good governance. He criticized CCM's reluctance to engage in meaningful dialogue and accused them of stifling dissenting voices within the political arena.
The clash between CCM and Chadema reflects broader tensions within Tanzanian politics, with each party presenting competing visions for the country's future. While CCM emphasizes stability and continuity, Chadema advocates for sweeping reforms to address perceived shortcomings in governance and democracy.
The clash between Tanzania's ruling party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), and the opposition party, Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (Chadema), has intensified, highlighting deep-rooted divisions and competing visions for the country's future.
Tundu Lissu of Chadema has reiterated his party's longstanding calls for constitutional reforms, criticizing CCM's history of delaying these changes and lamenting the rejection of Chadema's proposals for an independent electoral commission. He dismissed accusations of Chadema's divisive agenda, emphasizing their genuine concerns for democracy and good governance.
However, recent statements by Lissu have sparked condemnation from 11 political parties in Zanzibar, labeling them as discriminatory and incendiary. The Chairman of the ADA TADEA Party, Juma Ali Khatib, denounced Lissu's remarks and called for an investigation into his actions, alleging that they aim to foster division within Tanzania. Human Rights Activist Ali Makame Issa urged Tanzanians to refrain from spreading discriminatory statements.
The ongoing tiff between Tundu Lissu of Chadema and Abdulrahman Kinana of CCM highlights the broader ideological divide within Tanzanian politics. Kinana's defense of CCM's stance on constitutional reforms and electoral laws reflects the party's emphasis on stability and continuity, while Lissu's criticism resonates with Chadema's advocacy for sweeping reforms to address governance shortcomings.
Lissu's accusations of CCM's reluctance to engage in meaningful dialogue and stifling of dissenting voices within the political arena resonate with many opposition supporters who perceive the ruling party as resistant to change. Kinana's rebuttal portrays Chadema as obstructive and unwilling to collaborate constructively in the pursuit of national interests.
The clash between Lissu and Kinana reflects not only personal animosity but also deeper tensions between their respective parties. CHADEMA's persistent calls for reform challenge CCM's long-held dominance in Tanzanian politics, prompting defensive responses from the ruling party's leadership.
Additionally, Lissu's recent statements criticizing government decisions and referring to President Samia Suluhu Hassan, alleging that she is making decisions to oppress mainland Tanzanians because she comes from the other side of the Union, Zanzibar, have been met with condemnation from 11 political parties in Zanzibar. These parties, alleged to be appendages of CCM, have labeled Lissu's remarks as discriminatory and incendiary, further exacerbating the political tension in the country.
As the political discourse intensifies, the rift between CCM and Chadema may widen, exacerbating divisions within Tanzanian society. The outcome of this clash will not only shape the upcoming elections but also influence the trajectory of democracy and governance in Tanzania for years to come.
source:
DONATE:
SUPPORT RURAL NEWS BY DONATE VIA MOBILE PAYMENT NO: 54269119-VODACOM OR CRDB BANK AC NO 01J2058545300-SHINYANGA BRANCH (SWIFT CODE: CORUTZT10TD)
